)¢
OR
i
z
=
ce Py Oo
om Pe
Hw YU Q)
o 4 w cd
Oop GQ i St)
~ 3 uO
oO O oO Mm o
ow Wi @ o iW Oo
1) Ow 3 wm o
i @ oH
oa rc Q
oO wm @ Yo
aoa G fx
ag Ww o
Ho o,nn
oD SG
wy 2 Hed &
OV Qa Oo
HS Qo44
Hi E 1
gm O Youn o
oH U Ee “cl
wv 1 ~
oH ow
“ ou vO
rd My oy ed
ri} 3. 0Ort
> WO
© oO
G am
vo
4
)
+
co
Up
ICel
beca
law
ed as an
ea
r
ena
15
4
provi
Docket No. NR6761-14
who are retired are not eligible to transfer their educ
benefits.
tion
ow
Under these circumstances, the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
eR SRI
epee Seen
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5881 14
NAVY E DEPARTMENT OF TH a u r £ E 1 4 ‘ 4 i Go 4 Gb ne Bo 4H O ) { ‘ 4 1 Amini SAUL ii) p=) { Oa HOG YO py « n T wv a un) Oo im Oo ore O rp Oo @ on a 1 a a PA dd UO 4 vo cD ~ 2 oO OH S Q Vv G& Ox dh Pp ow OH id ume U2 crorde: oe Ny Rea rant Will comments ished 1 publ ns ulLatio ni er rTeTnd fit crewW1y re actly ad my ) memir a lectio Docket No. NR586i-14 who are retired are not eligible to transfer their education benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6468 14
{ ) al r a) ¢ a Tm 6d \ > gus oO 4 t cd ie) ) i ) r AUT) oti C { QO -d C ay) ty 43 GS o S es b Docket No. Members who are retired are not eligible to cransfer your education benefits. The Board found that there was not revision to the Post-9/11 GI Bill law or policy in December 2009 as you claim.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5325 14
mst ae ‘ 1 ‘ Ceewul Ti, oe ro b rT Ol? rE J < p INF C Cc ] 4 ) { } 4 THE NAVY catl ) c - ON . ory Pit saa > Cc EN 2R % W anmtlle COF EPARTM mz D ExASCCULL in BOA « suant i ren = 14 t 4 7a ox, WLCE nemb & \ LC ywyeraAg Net ae Ay Uol mars saaayyeto sieays als Cre i m+ W) ov 3 W ov g oO dt ) Y ma mous 4 Mt a) ”n 44 1 a 1 1 wo { ) Doh ei iv P) het yy 3 O Oo ec 4) rd ii} 4 BC gm 1) HH OW) Oo Vv OS Ee U d © aa) wm jp Hd Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14
Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10582 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings St this Board. It is regretted that the circumstances of your ca that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00413
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ............................ A - - - ------a - - 1'YPE UOTH PERSONAL APPEARANCE , GRADE A1 C X APSNRSAN I ----------------- . 3RD FLOOR ANUREWS AFB, MD 20761-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE C4SE NlJMEER FD-2006-00413 GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes...